aiprocess.design Open the studio

Comparison

aiprocess.design vs Miro, honestly

Miro is one of the best collaborative whiteboards ever made, and its AI generates flowcharts, UML and process maps from a prompt. If your job is broad visual collaboration, Miro is a fine answer. This comparison exists for a narrower question: what do you need when the deliverable is a process redesigned for humans and AI agents, with supervision and numbers a decision-maker will sign?

The difference in one sentence

Miro gives you an infinite canvas that can draw anything; aiprocess.design gives you a typed model of your process that can be checked, priced and implemented. Drawings communicate; models compute.

Miro aiprocess.design
Core purpose Collaborative whiteboard for any visual work Design studio for AI-era business processes
AI generation Flowcharts, UML, ERD and process maps from prompts Complete as-is + agentic to-be designs with allocation reasoning per step
Executor model Shapes and swimlanes you label freely Typed executors: human, AI agent, hybrid, system, with lanes enforced by the model
Agent properties Not modelled Autonomy (informs/recommends/acts), capability, risk (impact × likelihood), model choice
Governance Not built in 11-rule automated check, controls that supervise agents, human gates, one-click fixes
Business case Not built in Human hours vs token costs at live model prices, payback and ROI in euros
Implementation Not built in Per-step blueprints (setup/run/exceptions/handoff) and a delivery board with owners
Breadth Endless: retros, brainstorms, roadmaps, 250+ template categories Deliberately narrow: processes redesigned for humans + AI agents

Miro capabilities as described on miro.com (AI diagramming, AI process mapping, templates), August 2026. Miro is a trademark of its owner; this page is an independent comparison.

an agentic process design with typed agents, controls and gates that generic whiteboards do not model
What the typed model buys you: agents with autonomy and risk, controls that supervise, gates that decide.

Frequently asked questions

Is aiprocess.design a Miro replacement?

No. Miro is a general-purpose collaborative whiteboard and excellent at that breadth: workshops, retrospectives, brainstorms, diagrams of every kind. aiprocess.design does one job Miro does not attempt: designing business processes where AI agents execute steps, with governance and economics attached. Many teams will use both.

Miro has AI process mapping. How is this different?

Miro AI generates process diagrams from prompts, which is genuinely useful for visualisation. The difference is what the drawing knows: here every step is a typed object with an executor, autonomy, risk and cost, which is what makes automated governance checks, a euro business case and per-step implementation blueprints possible. A diagram shows the process; a model can defend it.

When should I pick Miro instead?

When the job is broad visual collaboration: workshops beyond processes, brainstorming, planning boards, design critiques, or when your organisation already lives in Miro and needs generic diagramming with AI assistance. If the deliverable is an agentic process design a client or a board must approve, that is the job this studio was built for.

Bring one process and compare the output

The studio is in private preview. Open it to request access, or walk through a real, read-only example first.

Open the studio See a live example →